E. Ring Fencing and Control of Cross-Subsidization
Core References
-
Ring Fencing Mechanisms for Insulating a Utility in a Holding Company System
Washington, D.C.: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, 2003.
Describes U.S. regulators’ practices for ring fencing.
-
The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988, Reissue Edition, vol. I, Chapter 6.
Examines issues of pricing in the presence of competition. Discusses issues of cross subsidy and price flexibility.
Sectoral References
ELECTRICITY
-
Decision: Statement of Principles for the Regulation of Transmission Revenues: Transmission Ring-Fending Guidelines: Reporting Guidelines
23 October 2002.
Describes accounting separations requirements for transmission provider in Australia. Includes accounting requirements, compliance, and reporting requirements.
-
Ring-Fencing in the Electricity and Gas Industries – Issues Paper
July 2000.
Examines ring-fencing policies in electricity and gas. Considers objectives, cross subsidization, preferential access to essential facilities, joint marketing, access to information, structural separations options, ring-fencing options, and criteria for evaluating options.
GAS
-
Ring Fencing Compliance Report Pro Forma
23 October 2002.
Form operators must complete showing compliance with the regulator’s ring fencing requirements. Includes compliance statement, separation of accounts, allocation of shared costs, treatment of confidential information, and management of marketing staff.
-
Ring-Fencing in the Electricity and Gas Industries – Issues Paper
July 2000.
Examines ring-fencing policies in electricity and gas. Considers objectives, cross subsidization, preferential access to essential facilities, joint marketing, access to information, structural separations options, ring-fencing options, and criteria for evaluating options.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
-
Record Keeping Rules on Initial Reports Relating to Accounting Separation
June 2003.
Sets out recording keeping and reports for accounting separations for dominant telecommunications provider.
-
Imputation testing (Initial Reports) Record Keeping and Reporting Rules, August 2003; Explanatory Statement: Imputation Testing Record Keeping Rule
September 2003.
Sets out rules and justification for imputation requirements for dominant telecommunications operator. Focuses on core services, namely local service, domestic access for originating and terminating calls, and retail services associated with the access services.
-
Initial Reports Relating to Accounting Separations of Telstra
December 2003.
Provides regulator’s review of initial accounting separations reports provided by dominant telecommunications operator. Examines both accuracy of reports and the extent to which they comply with the accounting requirements.
-
Decision for Approving the Regulation for the Realization, by ‘Romtelecom’ S.A., of Accounting Separation within the Internal Cost Accounting System
2003.
Describes accounting separations required by the Romanian telecommunications regulator to control cross subsidization and to comply with the European Union directives.
TRANSPORTATION
-
Regulation and Deregulation of the Motor Carrier Industry
Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1989.
Explains the problem of backhaul price regulation. The U.S. Interstate Commerce Commission rate regulation caused a duel effect. In the absence of rate competition non-price competition such as more frequent service can result. Also, spatial imbalances in traffic are exacerbated, resulting in more empty returns.
WATER
-
The completed acquisition of Northumbrian Water Ltd: A position paper
August 2003.
Sets out ring fencing requirements imposed on an operator as part of an acquisition.